while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
Junction-Guy:
"It is out of context, because it applied to the Nation (capitol N) of Israel."
You mean it's misapplied, not out of context. In which case the issues of Gays would be the same since Leviticus 20:13, which calls for the execution of gays, is also meant for Israel.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
Junction-Guy:
"I only use the King James Bible! but no matter which translation you use, I am sure you will use it out of context."
You've only made your ignorance worse. All you had to do is open up your bible to, Deuteronomy 22:28-29 which says:
28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay her father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the young woman, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives. Deuteronomy 22:28-29 New International Version
There is nothing there that you can't verify on your own so show me how it's out context.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
................................................................ /0084.gif)
arctic has gained hundreds of miles of ice the last three years.
red shows the september 2012 minimum extent.
green shows the current extent, which is likely the minimum for 2015. the arctic has gained hundreds of miles of ice over the past three years, much of which is thick, multi-year ice.. article.
And this Perry is what you get when you go to googlescholar.com and look for scientific articles with the phrase "global warming":
arctic has gained hundreds of miles of ice the last three years.
red shows the september 2012 minimum extent.
green shows the current extent, which is likely the minimum for 2015. the arctic has gained hundreds of miles of ice over the past three years, much of which is thick, multi-year ice.. article.
Perry: "Time magazine sums it up for me."
Time magazine is not a scientific journal. The other citations you made are not scientific either. If you want scientific journals you have to go to googlescholar.com and type in "climate change". My favorite citation is:
1975: Climate Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming?
Now for a sampling of scientific articles on the subject of global warming:
1994: What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models:
1993: Reflections on the economics of climate change:
1991: Climate change and wildfire in Canada:
1990: Global climate change and US agriculture: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v345/n6272/abs/345219a0.html
1989: The “greenhouse” effect and climate change:
1989: The potential effects of global climate change on the United States: Report to Congress
1988: Response of northern forests to CO2-induced climate change: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v334/n6177/abs/334055a0.html
1987:: Climate change and water resources: http://ks360352.kimsufi.com/redbooks/a168/iahs_168_0421.pdf
1986: The greenhouse effect, climatic change and ecosystems
1984: Response of unmanaged forests to CO2-induced climate change: available information, initial tests and data requirements: http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/5177193
1983: Effects of a Carbon Dioxide-Induced Climatic Change on Water Supplies in the Western United States https://portal.azoah.com/08A-AWS001-DWR/Omnia/19830000%20Revelle%20and%20Waggoner%20Effects%20of%20Climate%20Change%20on%20Water.pdf
1981: Climate change and society: consequences of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide: http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/6622138
1980: On the distribution of climate change resulting from an increase in CO2 content of the atmosphere
1979: Climate change from fossil fuel generated CO2 and energy policy: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160412079900266
1978: What might man-induced climate change mean?
1977: Carbon Dioxide and Climate: Possibly severe consequences of growing CO 2 release from fossil fuels require a much better understanding of the carbon cycle, climate change, and the resulting and the resulting impacts on the atmosphere
1977: Climate change and the world predicament: A case study for interdisciplinary research:
1975: Climate Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming?
1970: Carbon dioxide and its role in climate
change
1968: Early and Late Season Snowfalls: Evidence of Climate Change?
1956: The Carbon Dioxide Theory of Climatic Change: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1956.tb01206.x/abstract
1920: Science, religion and climate change: http://www.citeulike.org/group/13619/article/7673859
jws apply the fulfillment of what jesus fold in mathew 13:24-30 in what they call the great apostasy of christendom.
here jesus was speaking in parable, hence application should be made in its essence.
jesus sowed the seed (which means he preached the truth), later when it was compiled, selfish writers sowed weeds (interpolated their own ideas), and it became one book where on cannot distinguish what is good seed and weed.
There are many interpolated verses in the Bible but scholars always have a reason to back up their assertion that they are interpolated. Do you have a scholarly argument to prove your assertions? Those arguments usually involve finding a manuscript that does not have the scripture in question while another manuscript one does.
It seems that you just want to pick and choose scriptures that you don't want to believe in.
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/jul/27/jehovahs-witnesses-destroyed-notes-about-child-sex-abuse-inquiry-told.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/27/us-australia-religion-sexcrimes-iduskcn0q10ih20150727.
http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2015/07/28/australia-jehovah-witness-sex-abuse-hannigan-lklv.cnn.
Faithful Witness: "Am I an apostate?"
Of course you are. Anyone who pals around with apostates is one himself.
question 1 comes and the speaker asks for their response..they all yell no!.
what would happen then?.
